JURIDICAL REVIEW OF DEFECTS MADE BY PT. PERHUTANI (PERSERO) IN THE PURCHASE OF THE BUILDING OWNED BY PT. VISI INVESTAMA PROPERTI (CASE STUDY OF SOUTH JAKARTA DISTRICT COURT DECISION NUMBER 735/PDT.GL202LLPN.JKT.SEL. JO JAKARTA HIGH COURT DECISION NUMBER26

Penulis

  • Febrian Pratama Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Diana Ria W Napitupulu Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Binoto Nadapdap Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v5i3.172

Kata Kunci:

non-performance of contract, case study, corporate law

Abstrak

Basically, an agreement will go well if the parties to the agreement are based on good faith, but if one party does not have good faith or does not carry out their obligations, a breach of contract will arise. A breach of contract is a condition where the debtor does not fulfill his/her performance obligations in the agreement or does not fulfill them as they should or as they should In carrying out its business activities, a Limited Liability Company cannot be separated from agreement matters, one of which is PT. Visi Investama Properti, that PT. Visi Investama Properti as the owner of the Zuria Tower Building has an agreement to sell the Building to PT. Perhutani (Persero) then the agreement is stated in a deed of agreement. The main issue of the case is regarding the breach of promise (breach of contract) committed by PT. Perhutani (Persero) in carrying out the fulfillment of legal obligations in connection with the payment of the purchase of the Zuria Tower Building which has not been paid as stated in the Decision of the South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 735/PDT.GL202LLPN.JKT.SEL. Jo Jakarta High Court Decision Number 266/PDT/2023/PT DKI Jo. Supreme Court Cassation Decision Number 1755 K/PDT/2024. The method used in this study is normative research conducted as an effort to obtain the necessary data in connection with the problem. The data used is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. In addition, primary data is also used as supporting secondary data legal materials. For data analysis, it is carried out using qualitative legal analysis methods. From the research results, it can be obtained results based on the consideration of the panel of judges PT Perhutani (Persero) Proven to have been negligent (breach of contract) to PT. Visi Investama Properti as stipulated in Article 3 of the deed of agreement No. 88 dated December 26, 2019 That the Legal Consequences for the Parties in the Court's Decision PT Perhutani (Persero) is obliged to pay the remaining fine for late payment of the purchase of the Zuria Tower Building amounting to Rp. 8,232,300,000, - (eight billion two hundred thirty-two million three hundred thousand rupiah)

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Akhmad Budi Cahyono & Surini Ahlan Sjarif. 2008 Mengenal Hukum Perdata, Cet. 1. Jakarta: CV. Gitama Jaya

Bahrussam Yunus. 2020. Teknis Pemeriksaan Perkara Gugat Waris Bagi Hakim Peradilan Agama. Yogyakarta: UII Press, Cetakan Pertama

Binoto Nadapdap. 2020 Hukum Perseroan Terbatas berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007, Jakarta: Jala Permata Aksara

Diana R. W. Napitupulu. 2022 Pendaftaran tanah pensertifikatan Hak atas Tanah dan Peralihannya, Jakarta: Uki Press

Djumadi. 2004. Hukum Perburuhan Perjanjian Kerja. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Fockema Andreae. 1983. Kamus Istilah Hukum Belanda-Indonesia. Bandung: Bina Cipta

G.H.S. Lumban Tobing. 1992. Peraturan jabatan notaris (notaris reglement). Jakarta: Erlangga

Harlien Budiono. 2010. Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan; Cet. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Ida Bagus Wyasa Putra. 2017. Hukum Kontrak Internasional The Law Of International Contract, Cet I, Bandung: Refika Aditama

Kartini Muljadi & Gunawan Widjaja. 2006 Perikatan Yang Lahir dari Perjanjian. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

M. Yahya Harahap. 1996. Segi-segi Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni

M. Yahya Harahap. 2008. Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Mariam Darus badrulzaman. 2005. K.U.H.Perdata Buku III Hukum Perikatan Dengan Penjelasan, Cet. 2. Bandung: Alumni

Mukti Arto. 1996. Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

R. Setiawan. 1994. Pokok-pokok Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Bina Cipta

R. Subekti. 2010. Hukum Perjanjian cet.23. Jakarta: Intermasa

Ridwan Khairandy. 2013. Hukum Kontrak Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Perbandingan (Bagian Pertama). Yogyakarta: FH UII Press

Salim H.S. 2008. Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak innominaat di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Satjipro Raharjo. 2003. Sisi-Sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kompas

Subekti & Tjitrosoedibio. 2008. Kamus Hukum, Cet 17. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita

Subekti, Hukum Perjanjian, Cet. 21, (Jakarta: Intermasa, 2005) hlm. 17.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. 1984. Hukum Acara Perdata. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Wirjono Prodjodikoro. 2000. Azas-azas hukum perjanjian, cet 8. Bandung : Mandar Maju.

Wirjono Prodjodikoro. 2000. Azas-Azas Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Mandar Maju

Articles/Journals:

Endang Pratiwi dkk. Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum?, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 19, Nomor 2, Juni 2022.

Retno Kus Setyowati & Asmaniar. “Pembatalan Transaksi Hak Atas Tanah Oleh Penjual Dengan Alasan Belum Lunas,” Binamulia Hukum, Vol. 9 Nomor 1 (Juli 2020), hlm. 58-59

Electronic Resources:

Muhammad Rizaldi Warneri, S.H., LL.M.dkk. “Penelitian Format Putusan Pengadilan Indonesia: Studi Empat Lingkungan Peradilan Di Bawah Mahkamah Agung”, (https://mappifhui.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Penelitian-format-Putusa PengadilanIndonesiastudi- empat-lingkungan-peradilan-di-bawah-Mahkamah-Agung.pdf, accessed, 15 September 2024).

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2024-10-29

Cara Mengutip

Pratama, . F., Napitupulu, D. R. W., & Nadapdap, B. (2024). JURIDICAL REVIEW OF DEFECTS MADE BY PT. PERHUTANI (PERSERO) IN THE PURCHASE OF THE BUILDING OWNED BY PT. VISI INVESTAMA PROPERTI (CASE STUDY OF SOUTH JAKARTA DISTRICT COURT DECISION NUMBER 735/PDT.GL202LLPN.JKT.SEL. JO JAKARTA HIGH COURT DECISION NUMBER26. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW, 5(3), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v5i3.172

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles