Analysis of the Application of Restorative Justice in Cases of Minor offences Crimes as an Effort to Reduce Over Capacity in Correctional Institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v3i2.121Keywords:
criminal sanctions, criminal acts of theft, restorative justiceAbstract
In the application of criminal sanctions against criminal acts of theft in Indonesia, there is currently a paradigm shift from which initially still adheres to a system of retaliation against perpetrators of criminal acts into restoration to its original state, and not retaliation. This is expected to be one of the solutions to the problem of over capacity in Correctional Institutions. This type of research in legal writing is normative legal research with the nature of descriptive analytical research and a statutory approach, while the data collection technique uses library research and field research and data processing is carried out qualitatively. In the implementation of restorative justice there are several obstacles both at the investigator level and at the court level, including refusal from the parties involved to meet, the perpetrator does not want to pay the compensation proposed by the victim, the judge has not fully implemented restorative justice, there is no law that regulates explicitly regarding restorative justice and its application is only limited to minor crimes and imprisonment with a threat of five years in prison. Most law enforcers (police, prosecutors and judges) still have the mindset that crimes must end retributively (punishment) or still prioritize prison sentences besides that the level of public legal awareness is still low and one of the parties violates the agreement.
Downloads
References
Graha Dwi Jaya. Analisis Yuridis Empiris Pemberlakuan Restorative Justic. Tersedia di: http://eprints.umpo.ac.id/9114/2/Bab%20I.pdf
Muhammad Ivan Mahdi, Daftar Negara dengan Jumlah Narapidana Terbanyak, Ada Indonesia?, tersedia di: https://dataindonesia.id/ragam/detail/daftar-negara-dengan-jumlah-narapidana-terbanyak-ada-indonesia
Monavia Ayu Rizaty. Jumlah Narapidana Indonesia Terbanyak Keempat di Asia. Tersedia di: https://dataindonesia.id/ragam/detail/jumlah-narapidana-indonesia-terbanyak-keempat-di-asia
Monavia Ayu Rizaty. Jumlah Narapidana Indonesia Terbanyak Keempat di Asia. Tersedia di: https://dataindonesia.id/ragam/detail/jumlah-narapidana-indonesia-terbanyak-keempat-di-asia
Databoks. Penghuni Penjara Membludak, Ini Jumlah Narapidana di Indonesia. Tersedia di: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/05/12/penghuni-penjara-membludak-ini-jumlah-narapidana-di-indonesia
Adi Ahdiat, “Penghuni Penjara Membludak, Ini Jumlah Narapidana di Indonesia”. Tersedia di: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/05/12/penghuni-penjara-membludak-ini-jumlah-narapidana-di-indonesia
Hamja, “Implikasi Overcrowding Terhadap Lembaga Pemasyarakatan di Indonesia” tersedia di: https://journal.ugm.ac.id/v3/MH/article/download/2495/1740
Hendrizal Fira, Asimilasi Bagi Narapidana dalam Rangka Pelaksanaan Integrasi Untuk pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Penyebaran Covid-19 Pada Balai Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Padang. Tersedia di: https://stp-mataram.e-journal.id/JIP/article/view/1510/1169
Ditjenpas. WBP Terus Disosialisasikan Perpanjangan Program Asimilasi di Rumah. Tersedia di: http://www.ditjenpas.go.id/wbp-terus-disosialisasikan-perpanjangan-
Dimas Jarot Bayu. Lapas di Indonesia Menanggung Beban Berat-Analisis Data Katadata. Diakses pada tanggal 25 Agustus 2022, tersedia di: https://katadata.co.id/ariayudhistira/analis
Ahmad Naufal Dzulfaroh. Over Kapasitas Lapas, Masalah yang Tak Kunjung Selesai. Tersedia di: https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2020/02/15/071700565/over-kapasitas-lapas-masalahyang-tak-kunjung-selesai-?page=all
Agus Widjojo: Keadilan Restoratif dan Pendekatan Humanis Tidak untuk Menggantikan Keadilan Retributif. Tersedia di: https://www.lemhannas.go.id/index.php/berita/berita-utama/1230-agus-widjojo-keadilan-restoratif-dan-pendekatan-humanis-tidak-untuk-menggantikan-keadilan-retributif
Bambang Purnomo, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1994), hlm.16.
P.A.F. Lamintang, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia,(Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1994), hlm. 172.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, (Eresco: Bandung, 1986), hlm. 55.
Mahrus Ali, Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011), hlm. 185.
Lilis Retnowati, 2022, Penetapan Restorative Justice Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian. (Studi Kasus di Wilayah Kepolisian Sektor Laweyan)
Harkristuti Harkrisnowo. (2019). Pendekatan Restorative Justice dalam RUU KUHP. FH. Universitas Indonesia. Semnas, “Mendorong Restorative Justice dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia.”. Univ. Pancasila, 17 Juli 2019.
Muhammad Soma Karya Madari, 2013, Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Jumlah Denda Dalam KUHP Terhadap Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencurian. (Analisis Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan Dan Jumlah Denda Dalam KUHP) tersedia di: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/40870-ID-penyesuaian-batasan-tindak-pidana-ringan-dan-jumlah-denda-dalam-kuhp-terhadap-pe.pdf
Lamintang dan C. Djisman Samosir, Kejahatan Yang Ditujukan Terhadap Hak Milik dan Lain-lain Hak Yang Timbul dari Hak Milik, Nuansa Aulia, bandung, 2010, Hal. 97.
Yahya Harahap. 2010. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Hal. 422 tersedia di: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/tindak-pidana-ringan-tipiring-lt5876e928ba1b4
SKejaksaan Republik Indonesia. “Restorative Justice, Sisi Humanis Kejaksaan Yang Mengedepankan Perdamaian” tersedia di: https://www.kejaksaan.go.id/berita.php?idu=0&id=1791
Olivia Anggie Johar dan Fahmi. “Pelaksanaan Surat Edaran Kapolri No. 8/VII/2018 tentang Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Pidana di Kepolisian Resor Kota Pekanbaru.” Tersedia di https://rlj.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/RLJ/article/view/7880/6603.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.