JURIDICAL ANALYSIS ON BIPARTITE NEGOTIATION IN THE EMPLOYEE TERMINATION PROCESS AT PT. J RESOURCES BOLAANG MONGONDOW, INDONESIA

Authors

  • Theresa B. Tulende Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Hosiana D.A. Gultom Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Agus Budianto Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v2i2.39

Keywords:

Industrial Relations, Termination of Employment, Bipartite Negotiation.

Abstract

The disputes over termination of employment are common in the industrial relations. Many industrial relations actors settle disputes by filing lawsuits to the Industrial Relation Court. They assume that bipartite negotiation is ineffective in settling disputes of termination of employment in particular. In contrary, a company In Indonesia, named PT. J Resources Bolaang Mongondow, experiences it differently where the bipartite negotiation is well-emphasized in settling disputes of termination of employment. This is also supported by various strategies implemented inside the company to prevent any disputes, particularly the termination of employment that leads to the Industrial Relation Court. This paper uses descriptive analysis as well as normative-empirical legal as the research method. The data was collected through literature review, research papers, essays, national journal, interview, website as well as legal studies. The termination of employment is regulated under Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, while the Law No. 2 of 2004 regulates the Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement. Likewise, the Regulation of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia No. PER.31/MEN/XII/2008 concerning the Guideline for Settlement of Industrial Relations Dispute through Bipartite Negotiations. The disputes of termination in industrial relations emerge due to the violation of company regulation in the employment contract done by the employee. Nonetheless, PT. J Resources Bolaang Mongondow has been successfully implementing the bipartite negotiations to settle disputes. Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning the Industrial Relations Disputes Settlement requires that it has to be resolved first through bipartite bargaining in deliberation to reach consensus. Strategy determines the effectiveness of bipartite negotiations in a company.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

] Afrita, Indra. Hukum Ketenagakerjaan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Absolute Media. 2015.

] Amanda Lauza Putri, “Kenali Empat Jenis Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial dan Penyelesaiannya”, https://smartlegal.id/galeri-hukum/lainnya/2019/04/09/kenali-empat-jenis-perselisihan-hubungan-industrial-dan-penyelesaiannya/ diakses pada 18 September 2020.

] Dahlia dan Agatha Jumiati, “Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Berdasarkan UU Nomor 2 Tahun 2004”, Wacana Hukum, Vol IX, 2 Oktober 2011, hal 43-44.

] Gajimu.com, “Cara Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial”, https://gajimu.com/pekerjaan-yanglayak/serikat-pekerja/hubungan-industri al diakses pada 24 Mei 2020.

] Gilang Ramdani, “Manfaat Hubungan Industri yang Harmonis bagi Dunia Kerja dan Ekonomi Indonesia”, https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3447516/ manfaat-hubungan-industri-yang-harmonis-bagi-dunia-kerja-dan-ekonomi -indonesia diakses pada 17 September 2020.

] Haktivah,“Hubungan Kerja antara Pengusaha dan Pekerja Beserta Sifatnya”, https://www.kompasiana.com/amran/54fd84dba33311483d50fe5c/hubungan-kerja-antara-pengusaha-dan-pekerja-beserta-sifatnya diakses pada 17 September 2020.

] Khakim, Abdul. Dasar-dasar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti. 2014

] Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. ?

] Maringan, Nikodemus, “Tinjauan Yuridis Pelaksanaan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) secara Sepihak oleh Perusahaan Menurut Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2015, hal 2.

] Marmisah, Luis. Hubungan Industrial dan Kompensasi (Teori dan Praktek).Yogyakarta: Deepublish. 2019.

] Peraturan Menteri Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Nomor PER.31/MEN/XII/2008 Tentang Pedoman Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Melalui Perundingan Bipartit

] Rahmi Triani Uzier, “Tata Cara Penyelesaian Hubungan Industrial yang Wajib Anda Ketahui”, https://bplawyers.co.id/2017/03/23/3-tata-cara-penyelesaia n-perselisihan-hubungan-industrial-yang-wajib-anda-ketahui/ diakses pada 26 September 2020.

] Rizky, Ahmad Sridadi. Pedoman Perjanjian Kerja Bersama. Malang: Empatdua Media. 2016.

] Sarmanu. Dasar Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan statistika. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press. 2017.

] Tesishukum.com,“Pengertian Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Menurut Para Ahli”, http://tesishukum.com/pengertian-hukum ketenagakerjaan-menurut-para-ahli/ diakses pada 23 Juli 2020.

] Taufan, Sonny dan Swisca Yolanda. Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Rasi Terbit. 2015.

] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan

] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. ?

] Zulkarnaen, Ahmad Hunaeni, “Masalah Rawan Dalam Hubungan Industrial dan Konsep Negara Kesejahteraan Indonesia”, Jurnal Mimbar Justitia, Vol. II, No. 2, Juli-Desember 2016, hal. 810

Published

2021-03-26

How to Cite

Tulende, T. B. ., Gultom, H. D. A. ., & Budianto, . A. . (2021). JURIDICAL ANALYSIS ON BIPARTITE NEGOTIATION IN THE EMPLOYEE TERMINATION PROCESS AT PT. J RESOURCES BOLAANG MONGONDOW, INDONESIA. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW, 2(2), 9 - 21. https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v2i2.39

Issue

Section

Articles