The Ideal Concept towards the Welfare of Non-Livestock Animals in the Principle of Utilization and Utilization in Realizing Legal Certainty in Indonesia

Asmariah Asmariah

doi:10.8888/ijospl.v4i1.122

Authors

Asmariah Law Department, IBLAM College of Law, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.8888/ijospl.v4i1.122

Keywords:

animal protection, non-livestock animals, ideal legal concept.

Abstract

Indonesia has Law No. 41 of 2014 and Government Regulation No. 95 of 2012 to support animal welfare, but the country is still ranked as "D" on the animal protection index. This low ranking is due to the fact that the welfare of non-livestock animals in Indonesia has not been fully realized in practice, which is caused by the lack of clarity and certainty regarding regulations that govern the principles of animal welfare in their use and utilization, as well as the criminal sanctions within them. An analysis is needed to determine the extent to which existing legal regulations and sanctions can accommodate the scope of animal welfare principles in the use and utilization of non-livestock animals and to formulate legal protections accordingly. The research problem is how to formulate an ideal concept of legal protection for non-livestock animals in their use and utilization as a guide to creating legal certainty. This research is a descriptive analytical study using a combined social normative-empirical research paradigm. The methodology of this research incorporates a model for the ideal formation of law, which includes the integration of three legal theories: Lawrence Meir Friedman's legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture; Mochtar Kusumaatmadja's Law as a tool of social engineering, which states that law is a social control tool; and Satjipto Rahardjo's assertion that the law is for humans, not the other way around. The ideal formation of law model is one solution to realize animal welfare

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, K. K. (2017). Animal Welfare. Animal Welfare, 1–49. https://simdos.unud.ac.id/uploads/file_pendidikan_1_dir/9876f7a7374402256ce4b83145300cc7.pdf

Animal Welfare Worldwide. (2021). Trade of Dog and Cat Meat: Global Health Risks. February 2021, 1–20.

Aziz, N. M. (2012). The Urgency of Legal Research and Assessment in the Formation of Regulations. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i1.104

Dewi, P. R. K., Priadarsini, N. W. R., & Prameswari, A. A. A. I. (2019). Global Civil Society, Animal Welfare, and Cultural Value: Analysis of Dogs Are Not Food Movement in Bali. Udayana Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (UJoSSH), 3(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.24843/ujossh.2019.v03.i01.p05

Ferdowsian, H. R., & Gluck, J. P. (2015). The Ethical Challenges of Animal Research: Honoring Henry Beecher’s Approach to Moral Problems. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 24(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180115000067

Hantoro, N. M. (2012). Juridical Study of the Formation of the Law Regarding the Indonesian House of Representatives. Negara Hukum, 3(2), 154–180.

Junaidi, J. (2021). Synergy of Law and Power in Realizing Social Justice. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 30(1), 17–27. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/supremasihukum/article/view/13618

Knight, A. (2020). Should New Zealand Do More to Uphold Animal Welfare? Animal Studies Journal, 9(1), 114–149. https://doi.org/10.14453/asj.v9i1.5

L.Diab, A. (2014). The Role of Law as Social Control, Social Engineering, and Social Welfare. Al -’Adl, 7(2), 53–66.

Lestari, N. M. A. S., & Mudana, I. N. (2020). Implementation of Law Number 18 of 2012 Concerning Food in Medahan Village Market, Blahbatuh, Gianyar. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8(4), 667–677.

Lewis, A., Krageloh, C. U., & Shepherd, D. (2009). Pet ownership and health-rated quality of life in New Zealand. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 5(1), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.7790/ejap.v5i1.138

Maylina, A.D. (2021). Protection of Wild Animals against Exploitation through Animal Exhibits in Conservation Institutions: Indonesian Criminal Law Perspective. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 9(10), 1737–1749. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i10.p02

Mukhidin. (2014). Progressive Law as a Solution for Law that Benefits the People. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(3), 267–286. http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/PH/article/viewFile/1488/1156

Mukhti Fajar, & Achmad, Y. (2015). Dualism of Normative and Empirical Legal Research. 8(1), 15–35.

Mulyadi, L. (2009). The Theory of Development Law. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 8(2), 1–29. https://badilum.mahkamahagung.go.id/upload_file/img/article/doc/kajian_deskriptif_analitis_teori_hukum_pembangunan.pdf

Noviana, F. (2018). Pets as Human Substitutes in Japanese Families. Kiryoku, 2(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v2i1.11-17

Nugrahaeni, H. S. (2016). The Relationship Between Pet Attachment and Quality of Life in Pet Owners. The Relationship Between Pet Attachment and Quality of Life in Pet Owners, 1–101.

Remaja, N. G. (2014). The Meaning of Law and Legal Certainty. Kertha Widya: Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 1–26. https://ejournal.unipas.ac.id/index.php/KW/article/view/426/351

Santoso, M. I. B., & Setiyono, A. (2020). Implementation of Rabies Vaccination on Dogs and Cats in X Koto Singkarang Subdistrict, Solok Regency, West Sumatra. Jurnal Pusat Inovasi Masyarakat (PIM), 5.(2), 230–233.

Setiawati, S. (2016). The Use of Large Dictionaries in Learning Standard and Non-Standard Vocabulary. Gramatika STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, 2(1), 44–51.

Sumaya, P. S. (2018). The Relevance of the Application of Legal Theory in Law Enforcement to Realize Social Justice Values. Jurnal Hukum Responsif FH UNPAB, 6(6), 55–66.

Tribudiman, A., Rahmadi, R., & Fadhila, M. (2021). The Role of Pet Attachment in Pet Owners' Happiness in Banjarmasin City. Jurnal Al-Husna, 1(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.18592/jah.v1i1.3509

Yogar, H. N. A. (2021). The Price of Animal’s Soul: Late-Stage Capitalism, Animal Welfare and the Law. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 3(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v3i2.11939